<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en"><title>Tags @ www.talios.com</title><rights>Copyright 2010 www.talios.com</rights><subtitle>(Tags) </subtitle><author><name>Mark Derricutt</name></author><updated>2010-05-26T13:46:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talios.com/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talios.com/tags/index.rss?t=CONCORDION"/><id>tag:www.talios.com,2010:1</id><entry><id>tag:www.talios.com,2010-05-04:links.412208527</id><title>Embedding Screenshots in Concordion Specifications</title><content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.talios.com/embedding_screenshots_in_concordion_specifications.htm"><![CDATA[Over the weekend at the Datacom Devcamp I was discussing Concordion and the benefits of writing tests in plain english.  One idea that arose from the
conversations was having the ability to take screenshots of an application during test execution - t]]></content><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talios.com/embedding_screenshots_in_concordion_specifications.htm"/><updated>2010-05-04T21:14:00Z</updated><published>2010-05-04T21:14:00Z</published></entry><entry><id>tag:www.talios.com,2009-05-30:links.412172571</id><title>Writing Stupid Specifications with Concordion</title><content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.talios.com/writing_stupid_specifications_with_concordion_2.htm"><![CDATA[For a while I've been an avid lover of the concordion testing framework, but one thing I always struggled with was the separation of state/data between the specification and the fixture.  As a simple work around I added a simple "eval" command, which]]></content><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talios.com/writing_stupid_specifications_with_concordion_2.htm"/><updated>2009-05-30T23:18:00Z</updated><published>2009-05-30T23:18:00Z</published></entry></feed>